Home Up Contents

Parents Involved In Education of Plano

(P.I.E. of Plano)
Elem. Read & Write Elem. Math

 

Richardson
Garland
Lewisville

Sadly, this study shows that Plano’s math standards does not match its reputation.

The first table below shows each school and each grade groups with their respective percentages of students attaining passing and proficiency scores. For ease of comparison, we adopted a letter rating system pegged to the percentage of student attaining proficiency score. I have similarly tabulated the results of neighboring districts as a basis for comparison and have duly summarized the rating distribution in second table. In the third grade Plano had 3 schools out of a total of 28 getting a letter grade of C and 4 schools getting a D. When you look at the number of schools getting a grade C and above, it is clear that Plano lags behind Richardson and Lewisville at every elementary grade level both in numbers and percentages. When we compare Plano with four suburban districts of Houston, the picture is equally bleak.

The website developed a list of the state’s most successful schools over a three-year period from 1996-1998. The third table identifies the schools in this study which have consistently score above average proficiency ratings for mathematics at that grade level over a three-year period. Some districts have a relatively bad year in 1998 but still make it among the top schools because of their consistent performance. Garland’s third grade had only one school scoring a better than D rating in 1998 - the worst among the nine districts. However, it has three schools listed among the top performers. Likewise, Katy and Cypress-Fairbanks also fared worse than Plano in the third grade results in 1998 but still have top performers. No matter how we look at this, Plano needs to do much better with the resources at our disposal.

 

To do well in algebra later, a strong foundation is necessary in the elementary years. If this is indicative of a trend, it should concern us that Plano kids may not be as well prepared for future challenges. If so many Plano elementary students cannot be proficient on an admittedly easy test of minimally required math skills, even Merlin cannot make up for those lost years later. I hope that this article and subsequent ones on reading and writing as well as secondary level performances would help to increase public awareness and help us set higher goals than just passing TAAS.

Table 1: State of Plano’s Elementary Math

Based on 1998 TAAS Scores

at website: www.just4kids.org

 

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Schools

pass

prof.

Rating

pass

prof.

Rating

pass

prof.

Rating

Aldridge

86

48

F

89

54

F

92

46

F

Barron

68

26

F

69

24

F

87

49

F

Bethany

86

44

F

94

48

F

99

71

C

Brinker

94

76

C

96

63

D

99

75

C

Carlisle

96

62

D

98

75

C

98

76

C

Christie

84

46

F

87

41

F

93

64

D

Daffron

87

54

F

88

56

F

95

66

D

Davis

77

30

F

71

36

F

70

36

F

Dooley

99

55

F

98

69

D

97

73

C

Forman

77

39

F

89

53

F

86

57

F

Harrington

86

65

D

97

44

F

88

61

D

Hedgcoxe

92

44

F

89

50

F

96

57

F

Huffman

99

59

F

99

72

C

90

58

F

Hughston

99

75

C

95

59

F

100

84

B

Jackson

89

49

F

100

60

D

100

86

B

Mathews

94

54

F

98

72

C

95

60

D

Meadows

71

36

F

82

31

F

100

82

B

Memorial

94

59

F

91

69

D

91

56

F

Mendenhall

77

41

F

77

44

F

87

63

D

Mitchell

92

64

D

95

51

F

97

75

C

Rasor

94

57

F

99

62

D

100

82

B

Rose Haggar

96

50

F

100

61

D

99

81

B

Saigling

85

51

F

93

58

F

96

69

D

Shepard

99

69

D

94

60

D

92

56

F

Sigler

94

58

F

91

61

D

90

63

D

Thomas

94

59

F

97

57

F

98

60

D

Weatherford

91

45

F

82

49

F

89

53

F

Wells

100

70

C

96

79

C

99

76

C

All students are not in special education and have been continually enrolled through the school year.Results from the some new schools are not available.

Percentages are measured from bar charts with accuracy of plus/minus 2%.

prof. - percentage attaining proficiency score

pass - percentage attaining passing score.

Rating - based on proficiency percentage

A- 90-100%

B- 80-89%

C- 70-79%

D- 60-69%

F- 59% or less

 

Table 2: Comparison of Math Proficiency Rating With Other Districts

 

 

A

B

C

D

F

Total

% better than D

Third Grade

             
Plano

0

0

3

4

21

28

10.7

Richardson

1

1

4

3

25

34

17.6

Lewisville

0

1

6

2

13

22

31.8

Garland

0

1

0

6

32

39

2.6

Carrollton-Farmer’s Branch

0

0

0

1

16

17

0

Houston Districts              
Clear Creek

0

0

4

5

9

18

22.2

Katy

0

0

1

3

10

14

7.1

Spring Branch

0

4

2

2

15

23

26.1

Cypress-Fairbanks

0

0

3

8

19

30

10.0

Fourth Grade

             
Plano

0

0

4

8

16

28

14.3

Richardson

1

2

6

7

18

35

25.7

Lewisville

0

1

2

8

11

22

13.6

Garland

0

0

5

9

25

39

12.8

Carrollton-Farmer’s Branch

1

0

1

1

14

17

11.8

Houston Districts              
Clear Creek

0

1

1

8

8

18

11.1

Katy

0

2

3

7

2

14

35.6

Spring Branch

0

1

5

5

12

23

26.1

Cypress-Fairbanks

0

0

3

7

20

30

10.0

Fifth Grade

             
Plano

0

5

6

8

9

28

39.3

Richardson

3

8

5

5

14

35

45.7

Lewisville

1

3

4

9

5

22

36.4

Garland

0

5

11

7

16

39

41.0

Carrollton-Farmer’s Branch

1

1

3

5

7

17

29.4

Houston Districts              
Clear Creek

1

8

2

5

2

18

61.1

Katy

0

5

2

5

2

14

50.0

Spring Branch

2

4

1

4

12

23

30.4

Cypress-Fairbanks

3

4

8

8

7

30

50.0

 

Table 3: Top Texas Schools in Math (1996-1998)

 

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Plano: 0 Plano: 1

Memorial

Plano: 0
Richardson: 4

Arapaho

Jess Harben

Merriman Park

Richland

Richardson: 4

Jess Harben

Merriman Park

Richland

White Rock

Richardson: 3

Jess Harben

Merriman Park

White Rock

Lewisville: 0 Lewisville: 0 Lewisville: 0
Garland: 3

Ethridge

Rowlett

Spring Creek

Garland: 2

Keeley

Spring Creek

Garland: 0
Carrollton-FB: 2

L F Blanton

Sheffield

Carrollton-FB: 0 Carrollton-FB: 0
     
Clear Creek: 3

Armand Bayou

John F Ward

White

Clear Creek: 2

Armand Bayou

John F Ward

Clear Creek: 3

Armand Bayou

Brookwood

John F Ward

Katy: 2

Hazel S. Pattison

Memorial Parkway

Katy: 2

Hazel S. Pattison

Katy

Katy: 2

Edna Mae Fielder

Katy

Spring Branch: 2

Bunker Hill

Nottingham

Spring Branch: 2

Memorial Drive

Rummel Creek

Spring Branch: 4

Bunker Hill

Frostwood

Memorial Drive

Rummel Creek

Cypress-Fairbanks: 3

Copeland

Matzke

Post

Cypress-Fairbanks: 4

Copeland

Matzke

Post

Yeager

Cypress-Fairbanks: 4

Copeland

Lowery

Post

Yeager

 

 

1998

Proficiency Rating

Improvement made between 1996-1998

Substantial

> 14%

Moderate

10-14%

Marginal

5-9%

Stagnant

4 to -4%

Decline

<5%

Top

10% of BOS

Wells Carlisle Hughston    
Second

11-19% of BOS

  Brinker

Memorial

Rasor

Shepard

Sigler

Thomas

Dooley

Jackson

Mathews

Mendenhall

Mitchell

Huffman  
Third

20-29 % below BOS

  Saigling Christie

Meadows

Daffron

Harrington

Aldridge
Fourth

30-39% below BOS

  Bethany   Hedgcoxe Weatherford
Fifth

>39% below BOS

    Barron

Davis

   

Green lettered schools need some improvement in math.

Red lettered schools need significant improvements in math.

Underscored schools need improvements in both reading and math.

 

 

Send mail to tim_soh@hotmail.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: May 30, 1999